District enrollment is below its long-run peak.
Enrollment evidence · aggregate data only
Where did the 30% enrollment claim come from?
We can reproduce a near-term middle-school cohort increase. We cannot reproduce a districtwide 30% growth path—or determine what the reported 30% measured—without the complete NESDEC report and workbook.
What the available record shows
A cohort wave and districtwide growth are not the same thing.
The most recent five years are nearly flat (−1.0%).
Aggregate official count used in the independent continuation.
An 8.2% cohort increase can occur while district enrollment remains broadly stable.
Transparent continuation range; not a NESDEC forecast.
Meeting statement that cannot be fully reproduced without the NESDEC package.
The 2028 and 2031 values are independent, transparent continuations. They are not NESDEC projections and should be updated as actual cohorts and the consultant’s assumptions become available.
Claim-by-claim check
What aligns—and what still cannot be reproduced
The numerator, denominator, population, base year, horizon, scenario, confidence range, and decision record have not been supplied.
The independent cohort continuation reaches about 660 in 2028 from 610 in 2026, an 8.2% increase.
The result is sensitive to future kindergarten assumptions and cannot be traced to a complete NESDEC table.
The exact questions for the source record
What would let us understand the 30% figure?
Source and privacy boundary
The current analysis uses public aggregate records.
The supporting record is Wilbraham Enrollment Trend and Outlook v0.5.0, dated August 29, 2026. It uses aggregate DESE enrollment, municipal population, resident births, tax-base indicators, and the January 8 School Committee recording. It contains no student-level or protected information.
The official recording establishes what was said. It does not substitute for the complete NESDEC report, grade-by-year tables, footnotes, assumptions, or version identity.