Do we understand the whole decision?

Answer so far

The workbook now carries six paths through a complete 15-page journey and a Year 0–30 cashflow architecture. Current official inputs are still insufficient for a decision result.

The relationship to hold onto

A financial total cannot cure a missing decision gate.

Evidence and authorityWhat is established, by whom, and as of when?

Calculation readinessCan a complete Year 0–30 schedule be supported?

Decision readinessAre legal, facility, property, civic, finance, and vote gates resolved?

Established enough to carry forward

A bounded common frame

The asset identity, aggregate scale, historical screen, finance context, six paths, and calculation architecture can be shown together.

Wilbraham Middle School is the shared asset.
All six paths remain visible.
Page 6 is the sole source of headline cashflow totals.

Not established by this record

What cannot be inferred

The current record does not establish a preferred path or the actions needed to execute one.

Repair or replacement preference
Agreement terms or ownership transfer
Site, scope, MSBA outcome, financing, tax treatment, or vote
A result built by turning missing evidence into zero

S1Current structure + bounded interim bridgeNOT READY FOR CALCULATION

S2Regional responsibility; Town retains ownershipNOT READY FOR CALCULATION

S3Conditional transfer after defined gatesNOT READY FOR CALCULATION

S4Immediate transfer + same-site renovation/additionNOT READY FOR CALCULATION

S5New regional school at another siteNOT READY FOR CALCULATION

S6No MSBA / extended bridgeNOT READY FOR CALCULATION

See the workbook connection and limits

Workbook binding: WMS Decision Package!A1:N58

Page 6 totals link to Page 4 and then Page 1.

All six current cashflow result rows are blank because their gates are closed.

Controlled baseline: v0.7, SHA-256 d35db6de8563ce17bd311f760ac14a607f35839e452d2865477dc067d405b6ff.

Open the full source, missingness, and calculation contract →