Page 04 of 15Scenario comparison

Resident question

What changes by path?

Answer so far

Six paths remain in the comparison. They differ in responsibility, property, project/site, timing, terminal position, and failure branch—but none is ranked and none has a calculation-ready cashflow.

The relationship to hold onto

The same decision dimensions must be visible for every path.

Common basisThe same asset facts and categories apply.
Path-specific changeResponsibility, rights, timing, and exposure may differ.
Comparable rollupPage 6 totals flow here only after the path gate opens.

Neutrality rule

Comparison is not ranking

Order, color, copy, and detail level do not signal a preferred path. Missing fields stay visibly missing for all six alternatives.

Failure branches

No success-only story

Each path must retain a fallback if agreement, property, MSBA, feasibility, funding, authority, or public approval conditions fail.

S1

Current structure + bounded interim bridge

  • ResponsibilityRequires controlling evidence
  • Property / controlRequires controlling evidence
  • Project / siteRequires controlling evidence
  • Timing / transitionRequires controlling evidence
  • Terminal exposureRequires controlling evidence

NOT READY FOR CALCULATION

S2

Regional responsibility; Town retains ownership

  • ResponsibilityRequires controlling evidence
  • Property / controlRequires controlling evidence
  • Project / siteRequires controlling evidence
  • Timing / transitionRequires controlling evidence
  • Terminal exposureRequires controlling evidence

NOT READY FOR CALCULATION

S3

Conditional transfer after defined gates

  • ResponsibilityRequires controlling evidence
  • Property / controlRequires controlling evidence
  • Project / siteRequires controlling evidence
  • Timing / transitionRequires controlling evidence
  • Terminal exposureRequires controlling evidence

NOT READY FOR CALCULATION

S4

Immediate transfer + same-site renovation/addition

  • ResponsibilityRequires controlling evidence
  • Property / controlRequires controlling evidence
  • Project / siteRequires controlling evidence
  • Timing / transitionRequires controlling evidence
  • Terminal exposureRequires controlling evidence

NOT READY FOR CALCULATION

S5

New regional school at another site

  • ResponsibilityRequires controlling evidence
  • Property / controlRequires controlling evidence
  • Project / siteRequires controlling evidence
  • Timing / transitionRequires controlling evidence
  • Terminal exposureRequires controlling evidence

NOT READY FOR CALCULATION

S6

No MSBA / extended bridge

  • ResponsibilityRequires controlling evidence
  • Property / controlRequires controlling evidence
  • Project / siteRequires controlling evidence
  • Timing / transitionRequires controlling evidence
  • Terminal exposureRequires controlling evidence

NOT READY FOR CALCULATION

Resident comparison workspace

Choose up to three paths.

No path is selected. The model does not choose a default or imply a preference.

This workspace compares completeness and evidence needs. It does not calculate, score, rank, or recommend a path.

See the workbook connection and limits

Workbook binding: WMS Scenario Summary!A1:N45; WMS Cashflow!A1:AA58

Cashflow totals are linked; this page has no independent financial calculation.

Gross cost, local share, Wilbraham share, annual requirement, tax treatment, and terminal position remain separate.

Controlled baseline: v0.7, SHA-256 d35db6de8563ce17bd311f760ac14a607f35839e452d2865477dc067d405b6ff.

Open the full source, missingness, and calculation contract →